It depends on the information disclosed in current affairs news. If it is to fulfill the function of letting the society know, when it is news and plays the role of news , should be more tolerant than ordinary works, and should be quickly made known to the public, such as major events that occur internationally and domestically. If too much emphasis is placed on protection and charging for reprinting is required, this will violate the purpose and guiding ideology of news. But when news no longer becomes news, when it no longer has the function of news, and the work function of these pictures is more emphasized, I personally think that it should enjoy the need for work protection.
How to define it specifically? How to deal with practical problems depends on the specific circumstances of the case. In fact, this is also a matter of finding a balance. However, if the news picture is regarded as current affairs news, according to the interpretation of the Supreme Court, even if it is reprinted, the source should be indicated, the name of the author must be included, and the name of the original news unit must be published, otherwise the original news unit has spent a lot of money They force people to go out to interview, and the person whose news is being reprinted writes his or her name, so that people can’t figure out whose news it is. Although news is not subject to copyright law, it must be handled in accordance with these regulations.
The above is the summary brought by the editor of Legal Savior Network. If you have other questions, you are welcome to go to the Legal Savior Network for online consultation.
No comments yet. Say something...