Is it considered infringement to modify the photograph?

After we discover the other party's photography works, if we have some inspiration and make some modifications based on the other party's work, will it infringe on the other party's rights? Below, in order to help everyone better understand the relevant legal knowledge, the editor of Legal Savior Network has compiled the following content. I hope it will be helpful to you.

Does modifying the photograph constitute infringement?

Infringes upon the modifications made by the original author rights and the right to protect the integrity of the work.

But if your modifications have made your picture fundamentally different from the original picture and have a certain degree of originality, it can become a new work, no It's considered infringement.

Infringement of copyright must meet the following three conditions:

1. There is infringement The fact is that the perpetrator uses the copyright owner's works, as well as performances, audio-visual products, and radio and television programs without the copyright owner's permission and without complying with the conditions of use stipulated in the copyright law. Copyright infringement does not require the consent of the author or other copyright holders, nor does it fall under fair use or statutory use. This is unauthorized use of the work, and is therefore a violation of copyright law. This kind of infringement may not only damage the personal rights of others, but also damage the property rights of others. It may also damage the personal rights and property rights of others at the same time. For example, illegally copying other people's works may only infringe others' copyright property rights, while counterfeiting other people's works often infringes other people's personal rights and property rights at the same time.

2. The behavior is illegal. Copyright is an absolute right, and everyone is responsible for the obligation of inaction not to infringe this right. Others must abide by copyright law and other relevant legal provisions when using copyrighted works. If an actor violates the provisions of the law, his behavior is illegal. As for works that are not protected by my country's copyright law, works that have not been copyrighted, or "works" that have entered the public domain, there is no infringement issue when others use them.

3. The perpetrator is subjectively at fault. The so-called fault refers to the infringer's psychological state regarding his infringement and its consequences, including intentional and negligent. form. The vast majority of copyright infringements are intentional; there are also a few that can be caused by intentionality or negligence. Distinguish between forms of fault when determining the legal liability of the tortfeasorThere is a certain meaning. Generally speaking, the legal liability for intentional torts is heavier than the legal liability for negligent torts.

The above content is the relevant answer. If you are a very creative person, then generally it will not be regarded as infringement, but If it becomes a new work and there is not much difference from the previous original picture, it will involve some copyright infringement. If you have other legal issues, you can consult the relevant lawyers on the Legal Savior Network.