Is it infringement if the photographer posts photos of models
Photographers posting photos of models do not necessarily infringe copyright infringement.
It depends on whether the model is a paid model. If the photographer pays her a modeling fee, then the model's portrait rights will naturally be transferred to the photographer. As long as it is not for profit, she can publish her photos at will without infringing on her portrait rights.
If both the photographer and the model take the photos for free, the portrait rights still belong to the original model, and the photographer cannot publish the model's photos without her consent.
If the photographer is paid, it is the model who pays If the photographer pays the shooting fee, then the portrait rights belong to both parties, but the photographer only has a limited right of use, which means that the photographer can only use these photos as samples, information sheets, or archive them internally, but cannot make them available to the public. public.
If the photographer takes a news documentary photo of an unspecified person, according to the law, as long as the photo is authentic, such photo does not infringe on the portrait rights of the person being photographed and can be released publicly.
After reading this article, everyone knows it, right? , in practice, when we face such a situation, we must analyze it from different situations. This requires specific situation analysis to clarify this point. Only in this way can we know which situations are infringements and which situations are not infringements. If If you have any other questions, please feel free to consult the professional lawyers on the Legal Savior Network.
No comments yet. Say something...