The difference between invention patent and utility model

As we all know, my country has patent protection, but the protection for specific inventions, Utility models, and designs in patents is different. So do you know the difference between invention patents and utility models? Today, the editor of Legal Savior Network has compiled relevant legal knowledge for you on "The Difference between Invention Patents and Utility Models". I hope it will be helpful to you.

1. The difference between invention patents and utility model patents

1. Protection Difference: Utility model patents are only related to the shape and structure of the product, and their scope of protection is narrower than invention patents. The protection period for utility model patents is 10 years, and the protection period for invention patents is 20 years, both calculated from the filing date.

2. Progress is different: In the process of patent inventiveness review, invention patents need to have "outstanding substantive features and significant progress", while utility model patents All it takes is “substantial features and improvements.” The level of creativity required for utility models is lower than that for inventions. Therefore, some people call utility model patents "small inventions" or "small patents."

3. Different approval procedures: "Patent Law" Patent applications for utility models are subject to a simpler examination and approval process than those for invention patents. Utility models only undergo preliminary examination, while invention patents require substantive examination in addition to preliminary examination.

4. The review cycles are different: Utility model patents can generally obtain patent certificates in about 6 months, and invention patents can generally obtain patent certificates in about one and a half years. , because the technical fields of invention patents are wider, and the review cycles in different technical fields vary greatly. In some technical fields, it may take 2-3 years, or even longer.

2. How to find a suitable lawyer for intellectual property disputes?

If you want to ask questions, the following points are for reference:

1. Excellent professional quality: You can use the lawyer's information, evaluation records and other information to judge;

2. Faster responseResponse speed: It can be inferred from the lawyer's service record;

3. Sincere service attitude: It can be identified by the lawyer's answer and consultation content.

If you are going to litigate, you need to pay attention to the following points:

1. Excellent Professional quality: It can be judged through the lawyer’s information, evaluation records and other information;

2. Good image and temperament: It can be judged through the lawyer’s personal photos, audio and video explanations Intuitive feeling;

3. Rich practice experience: This can be supported by cases handled by lawyers.

They both have different meanings. If you still have questions, this website also provides online consultation with lawyers, and you are welcome to consult.