What evidence should defendants in technology contract dispute cases provide?

When technology is transferred, both parties will sign a contract to ensure the rights or obligations of both parties. But even if the cooperation between the two parties is regulated through a contract, disputes may arise and cause trouble. So, what evidence should defendants in technology contract dispute cases provide? Listen to the specific opinions given by the editor of Legal Savior Network.

What evidence should defendants in technology contract dispute cases provide?

The evidence that the plaintiff should provide mainly includes: written contract, technical information related to the contract, feasibility study report, technical evaluation report, project mission statement and plan, technical standards and specifications, original design and process documents, technical drawings, relevant Technical tables and data photos, etc.

What are the legal circumstances for the termination of technology contracts?

"The Supreme People's Court's Rules on the Trial of Technology Contract Dispute Cases Applicable Interpretation of Several Legal Issues

Article 15 If one party to a technical contract delays the performance of its major debts and fails to perform within 30 days after being urged, the other party shall, in accordance with the contract, If the provisions of Article 94 (3) of the Law require the termination of the contract, the people's court shall support it.

If the party attaches a time limit for performance in the reminder notice and the time limit exceeds 30 days, the people's court shall determine that the time limit for performance is specified in Article 94 of the Contract Law. The reasonable period specified in item (3).

Article 23 The parties to a patent application right transfer contract request to terminate the contract on the grounds that the patent application has been rejected or deemed to have been withdrawn. This fact occurs in accordance with the patent application. The People's Court shall support the transfer of patent application rights before the registration of the patent application right as stipulated in Paragraph 3 of Article 10 of the Law; if the transfer occurs after the registration of the transfer, the People's Court shall not support the transfer, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

The patent application was rejected because there was a prior patent application for the same invention that had not yet been disclosed when the patent application rights transfer contract was established. The parties relied on Article 50 of the Contract Law The provisions of Item (2) of Article 4, Paragraph 1, are requested to be changed orIf the contract is revoked, the people's court shall support it.

It is possible to encounter any technical contract dispute in life. At this time, you can first come to the Legal Savior Network to consult a professional lawyer to get advice on how to deal with it.